So my question is, does using 'shall' instead of 'must' remove this comedy interpretation or improve the sign in any way? No one really uses 'shall' any more, but it indicates future and apparently has some sense of being a command. 'Must' also expresses a command ('deontic necessity' - it can also express 'epistemic necessity' as in 'It must be cold outside'). Does 'shall' seem politer? Does a warning sign need to be polite? Unknown. Some more good suggestions here.
(photo credit not known; it's all over the internet) |
I don't think the modal verb makes any difference (except that 'shall' sounds a bit old fashioned and probably therefore more authoritarian?) but doesn't the tone group change depending on whether it is taken to mean 'if you have a dog, you must carry it' (dogs must be CARRied') or 'you mustn't use the escalator unless you are carrying a dog'? (DOGS must be carried.)
ReplyDeleteYes, I would say that was correct. At least, saying it like that gives me that reading.
DeleteNo one really uses 'shall' any more
ReplyDeleteI use "shall" all the time. I say to my wife "Shall I close the window?", meaning "Do you want me to close the window?".
Hm. I thought I replied to this but it must have got eaten. Anyway, yes, it is used in questions, of course you're right. But in declaratives, it's now quite rare. It's interesting that it's hung on in one context and not the other.
DeleteIt's usually used in making offers, or at least that's the use that's commonly presented in ELT material. Nice article here on some prescriptivist poppycock about 'shall': https://badlinguistics.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/simon-heffer-and-a-cartload-of-rubbish/
Delete